Home > Blogs > The Editorial: The Planning Season > Cash in Hand
Blogs
Cash in Hand
by Ruth Barker, 9 Aug 2010
Hello,
Firstly, I’d like to draw your attention to this contribute if you can.
Secondly, I’d like to draw your attention to this contribute if… well this one’s more complicated. If you follow the link, you’ll see that Shetland Arts and Mission Models Money are running a consultation looking at whether artists are likely to be benefited by having the option to take out loans. A source tells me that the loans they’re talking about aren’t too big (around £500) and are envisaged as paying for fairly concrete costs – for example paying to frame a painting that could then be sold.
But loans are still a contentious issue so in a way I’m surprised to see that the survey’s been launched. I’d be curious to know more about its inception. Why the contention? Well, perhaps it’s stating the obvious, but many artists are not in the most stable financial circumstances. What happens to the painter in the above example if the painting doesn’t sell? I hate to say it, but artists sometimes don’t make the most objective business plans!
My own opinion is that loans are never an unproblematic option – not least because of the fundamental significance of one person being in debt to another. That doesn’t mean that they’re not an option though. There are plenty of loans on the market already after all. I know that there have been calls from some quarters for the consultation to be scrapped, but this itself raises questions to my mind. After all, surely artists are responsible enough to make their own views known in a consultation format like this? If loans aren’t wanted or needed, surely people will say so? And, of course, it may be that some people would find a loan of the type proposed by Shetland Arts and Mission Models Money to be useful. It’s never been the case, after all, that all creative practitioners will fit into the same box when it comes to what they want or need to keep their practice going.
So I am interested to know the results of the survey. If Shetland Arts or Mission Models Money want to get in touch we’d be more than happy to hear from you. Likewise if anyone else feels strongly about this issue.
Let us know your thoughts,
More later,
R.
ps. Variant have reminded me that you can read some email exchanges regarding the survey – and an explanation of why Variant would like it to be withdrawn – here
Please login to leave comments.

Comments
18 Aug 2010
Leigh French
The survey, the primary research, propounds loans of up to £20,000+. The interest ranges from 5% to 40% (the survey does not give the option of clearly stating anything less than 5%). To repeat the tender brief’s focus on wee bits of money is to ignore what is actually being sought by a survey resembling a credit card application. Such is the discrepancy between what politicians say and what they do.
But this is to miss the point.
The Scotland-wide survey doesn’t meet basic academic ethical standards as there is no evidence-base from which to form the survey questions in the first instance — that research tender was cancelled by the Scottish government and SAC.
Variant are therefore asking for the survey to be withdrawn.
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment.